The third chapter of A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man is a rush of religious experience, plunging the reader into the fiery depths of hell as Stephen Dedalus pictures it. The strange thing is how he seems to feel a fear of hell, and a shame for disappointing God, rather than guilt for having treated the people around him coldly. There's clearly a kind of narcissism going on here where he thinks he is beyond his peers and is at a level with God.
His concept of conscience is unrelated to seeing and treating people as equals. The irony is shown when Stephen Dedalus sees the peasant girls on the street, and feels pity for himself that their souls were "dearer to God than his." This is supposed to be a turning point in which Stephen Dedalus seeks to give up his life of sin, but rather than despise his own actions, he is once again looking down his nose at others. In this moment, he commits two sins, pride and envy, and those are part of what compel him to repent. His idea of virtue is clearly warped and motivated by self interest.
I see that Stephen Dedalus has in many ways developed very little throughout the chapter. He started the chapter indifferent to his peers, seeing himself as superior and them as dull and indistinguishable. By the end of the chapter, he is once again seeing others as lesser to himself when he perceives the peasant girls as unworthy of being closer to God than him. Thus far in the novel, I have noticed Stephen Dedalus has been consistently distant from other people. It's as though everyone around him is vague and undefined, and he only sees himself clearly. In fact, his sense of self is so piercing that he often puts himself next to God. He describes sin as being consequential merely because it has "covered him from the sight of God," and when he repents, he immediately feels relieved of all guilt since he believes God has forgiven him. The feelings of those he may have hurt are irrelevant to him.
This narcissism is perturbing, and I wonder how this effects his coming-of-age. If coming of age has to do with developing a personal moral code, I'm not sure which direction Stephen Dedalus is heading. At the beginning of the book, he followed the words of others too closely, and obsessed over right and wrong. By this point, Dedalus seems to have a complete disinterest for what others have to say. Earlier on, he would eagerly refer to the words of the fellows or his father when seeking the right answer. Now, he allows the principles of Catholic theology to be his moral compass, even if he chooses not to obey them. In both cases, I see a very artificial distinction between right and wrong. This is largely a problem of a lack of empathy. He doesn't seem to be able to relate to the people around him enough to permit him much moral intuition, so he relies on some external form of judgement, be it his peers or God.
I think a major way that Stephen Dedalus deals with coming of age in a way that allows self-development is his tactic of taking things directly to God. His self-absorption prevents him from building meaningful relationships with the people around him which is a part of growing up that can largely shape someone's character. He, however, thrives on this intense connection to God. He sees God watching his every move as he sins, and he sees God as the sole worthy judge of his actions. I would expect him to be more concerned about what his father thinks of his actions, but he never even mentions a kind of shame at imagining his father see him like this when he is spending his nights in brothels. Also linked to Dedalus's isolation is the sheer lack of relationships he has with other boys his age. Most adolescents effect each other immensely as they experience similar changes simultaneously. Yet Stephen Dedalus doesn't spare his peers a second thought, and he comes of age very much on his own.
Perhaps I am being too harsh to describe Stephen Dedalus as egotistical and lacking in empathy. We do see some glimpse of awareness of others when he describes seeing the shame his eyes invoked in the prostitutes. But even then, he his senses are "stultified only by his desire," and when he repents, he expresses no regret for wounding these women, only remorse for losing God's good graces. I'm interested to see if Dedalus will ever grow in his ability to form relationships and empathize with others as he continues to come of age.
I agree with your analysis of how narcissistic Stephen is and how perturbing it is as a reader to watch someone be that self absorbed. He thinks himself better than everyone else and this often makes him hard to sympathize with. I hope Stephen will learn to empathize with other humans by the end of the book. One point I am not so sure about is whether he should feel guilt to his fellow human beings. After all, it's hard to find examples in the book of where Stephen mistreated other people. He is often angry and mistreats people with his thoughts, but he never acts on them. He is a goody two-shoes. In this sense, it makes sense that he feels guilt towards God but not people because he is sinning more against God than he is against people.
ReplyDeleteGreat post! Stephen's narcissistic tendencies are definitely a very interesting point to discuss, and I'd like to provide another view to the claims you present in the first paragraph.
ReplyDeleteIn many religions God is presented as an individual (or thing, or whatever your belief is) who is to be feared. Similarly the idea and concept of hell is something that is meant to be feared. In many beliefs (and we know Stephen is Catholic from his upbringing by the Jesuits) God is the one who will judge individuals come the ever nearing "judgement day". I proclaim to be a United Methodist, but more simply I'm a Christian. Although my own personal upbringing did not preach a view that God that was to be "feared", I know many people's whose upbringing did. There's a term to describe many Christians as "God fearing people" (I know Mr. Sutton uses it a lot) and that is accurate to an extent. Many Christians do fear God and that's what causes them to "do good" or not sin (side note - not all Christians believe this, I'm more of a "God loving" type of person).
I would make the argument that all Stephen has ever known was an all-mighty, all-powerful God who will expect you to account for all your actions come judgement day. Now, because of this belief (again, which many people still hold) he believes that all of his problems should be between him and God. These issues are not other people's issues, and he needs to confess his sins to God, not to his peers. This is a complex issue, because I agree with you that Stephen is a bit narcissistic, yet I think his relationship with God should be completely expected and cannot really be used as an argument for this behavior.
~Wyatt
From what we see of his religious education, the church seems to really stress the "God as vengeful judge" element, maybe because this is what "works" with boys this age. (The sermon certainly gets their attention! And maybe it's a stereotype, but it seems like the gory details of torture and torment are crafted to appeal to the tastes of boys this age. I wonder how the sermon would go at a girls' school in this same period--I imagine it would be much less gory.)
DeleteBut it also might reflect the stuff that "sticks" in Stephen's mind especially strongly. As we learn in chapter 4, he has a hard time wrapping his head around the concept of divine love. He understands, intellectually, that it's a key part of his theology, but he can't *feel* it the way he certainly feels the fear of death and damnation. Presumably, the church has been teaching him about God's love (and it is a small part of the sermon, too, near the end), but those "lessons" aren't working *for him*. Maybe because of a (narcissistic) tendency in Stephen's own psychology? He responds to fear and intimidation more strongly than to the prospect of being loved eternally.
Throughout the whole book, I've also found it rather unsettling that Stephen is so seemingly disconnected from the world and the people around him. He kind of goes from caring about what other people think and wanting to know what is right and what is wrong, to caring only about what God thinks and what that means for him personally, to not caring about what anyone thinks and just wanting to get away from everything. It's a huge change, from baby Stephen to college Stephen. What really bothers me is how Stephen doesn't *feel* real love. Is he honestly just not able to feel any love, or does he just not give himself a chance to do so because he doesn't allow himself to become close to people? I think I would agree with the latter, because he never seems to try to get to know people, either because he's intimidated by them or because he thinks he's too good for them. What I find especially interesting though, is how Stephen seems to move away from God as the novel progresses, and yet the very last line of the book seems like it's a prayer for God to guide him through the future.
ReplyDelete